Higher education's energy studies programs are criticized for lacking realism and being overly focused on climate activism. Many courses promote the narrative of easily replacing hydrocarbons with renewables, ignoring energy realities and trade-offs. Germany's high energy prices and struggling factories contrast with China's comprehensive energy strategy encompassing diverse sources and supply chain dominance. Africa's energy scarcity highlights the importance of affordable, reliable energy for human flourishing and health. A study reveals that most energy-related courses at top US universities are climate-centric, neglecting crucial aspects of current energy systems. Students often lack exposure to essential concepts like baseload power, materials, and fuel logistics. The author advocates for a core "Energy Reality 101" course covering various energy sources, trade-offs, and market dynamics. A rebalanced curriculum should include systems, markets, and the dominant technologies, including fossil fuels, fostering a comprehensive understanding. Site visits to energy infrastructure could enhance practical knowledge and understanding. The author emphasizes the need for free speech and debate in energy education, promoting fact-based arguments.
zerohedge.com
zerohedge.com
Create attached notes ...
