Collab Fund

CollabFund is a venture capital firm with an innovative approach to investing in early-stage startups. The site highlights its involvement in various sectors such as technology, healthcare, and sustainability. It provides information on the companies they've invested in, including well-known success stories and ongoing partnerships. Additionally, visitors can find details on the team behind CollabFund, which comprises experienced tech entrepreneurs and investors.

Thread Of Notes

CdXz5zHNQW_4027a9VHDS.png
Nan Ransohoff's analysis highlights a third wave of American philanthropy, driven by wealth generated from AI and founders eager to give it away. She argues that existing philanthropic systems are ill-equipped to handle this new influx of capital. The author agrees, posing a crucial question: what if the most impactful social institutions of the future aren't nonprofits? Historically, philanthropy followed wealth creation, with entrepreneurs funding repairs for societal problems caused by their industries. Early philanthropists like Carnegie and Rockefeller were systematic, viewing giving as strategic investment in enduring institutions. This "two-ledger" system separated business success from charitable impact. However, a new generation of founders is blurring these lines, integrating their company's mission directly into its operating model. These "mission-driven companies" aim for success where societal good is intrinsically linked to profit. While some critique this as mere marketing, the strongest examples demonstrate that business growth is contingent on achieving the stated mission. Companies like WHOOP and Redwood Materials exemplify this, where their revenue scales as positive social outcomes are realized. The author suggests that this alignment of incentives represents a crucial part of the philanthropic imagination. Not all problems have market solutions, and traditional non-profits and public funding will remain vital safety nets. However, embracing companies whose core business is aligned with societal progress expands the definition of philanthropy beyond traditional financial donations. This "third wave" is characterized by founders who refuse to separate wealth creation from societal benefit from the outset.
Tristan Walker is joining Collaborative Fund as a Partner.In that role, he’ll be a voice for the kind of company-building we stand for and a resource for the founders pursuing it. We’ve long believed that the best people to support founders are other founders, specifically those who have built enduring, values-driven companies through the full cycle of highs and lows. Tristan is a textbook example of that.The relationship here goes back over a decade. I backed Tristan when he launched Walker & Company and watched up close as he built Bevel with incredible clarity and integrity. That journey eventually led to an acquisition by Procter & Gamble—proof that you can build a successful brand by serving communities the market overlooks.Tristan’s experience isn’t limited to a single win. He was the third employee at Foursquare, an EIR at Andreessen Horowitz, and co-founded Code2040 to help diversify Silicon Valley. Today, he brings a wealth of governance and leadership experience from his board service at Shake Shack, Foot Locker, and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta. And he’s still building: his latest venture, Heirloom, is working to reshore American fine craft, training the next generation of artisans and rebuilding the supply chains behind it.At Collaborative, we look for builders rather than just allocators. Tristan’s track record as a founder and his deep roots in both business and civic life make him an invaluable partner for the founders we support.We’re lucky to have him on the team.
CdXz5zHNQW_EzCSD6jVYv.jpeg
CdXz5zHNQW_nUgcWpIgEL.jpeg
NBC Sports was in trouble in the early 1990s after losing Major League Baseball, but it was able to turn things around under the leadership of Dick Ebersol and a young producer named Jon Miller. Miller was tasked with filling the network's programming schedule on a shoestring budget, which forced him to be creative and experiment with new ideas. This led to the development of innovative events such as the NFL Quarterback Skills Challenge and the American Century Celebrity Golf Tournament. Miller's success was due in part to a concept called cognitive resourcefulness, which refers to the ability to think outside the box and come up with novel solutions when resources are scarce. This concept is not unique to sports television, as it can be seen in other areas such as business and investing. Many successful companies, including Airbnb and Uber, were founded during economic downturns and were forced to be creative due to limited resources. In investing, having limited resources can actually be an advantage, as it forces individuals to think differently and come up with unique solutions. The current bull market and stable economic conditions may not last forever, and investors should be prepared for the next crisis by having a plan in place and being ready to invest in innovative companies and ideas. By focusing on what can be controlled and being prepared for the unexpected, investors can turn a crisis into an opportunity. The key is to be creative and think outside the box, just like Jon Miller did when he was tasked with turning around NBC Sports.
CdXz5zHNQW_8yJoAa5BBj.jpeg
The author reflects on their experiences with chronic back pain and how it affects their mood and behavior, leading them to consider that people's actions are often influenced by unseen factors. They note that most harm done to others is unintentional and that people tend to underestimate the negative consequences of their actions. The author also discusses the concept of evil and how it can be perpetuated by individuals who do not recognize the harm they are causing. Additionally, they touch on the idea that social media can create unrealistic expectations and promote disappointment among those who feel they are below average. The author believes that many societal problems stem from housing affordability issues and that building more homes could have a significant positive impact. They also consider the impact of technology on society, noting that while the internet has brought many benefits, it has also had negative consequences such as increased political polarization and decreased attention spans. The author expresses hope that future generations will look back on the current era of political divisiveness as a low point that has been overcome. They also discuss the cyclical nature of public opinion and trust in government, suggesting that it is difficult to predict when and how these cycles will shift. The author's reflections are influenced by their own experiences and observations, as well as the ideas of other thinkers, such as Roy Baumeister. Overall, the author's thoughts are centered around the idea that understanding and empathy are essential for building a better society.
The author of this story often gets asked where he gets ideas, and he says it's from everywhere, including a Christmas tree lot on a cold December night. The author and his brother used to go with their dad to pick out a Christmas tree every year, but when they left for college, their dad had to do it alone. Recently, they decided to help their dad, not just because he's 78 and might struggle with a large tree, but also to witness his selection process and defend him from their mom's criticism. Their mom would always find flaws in the tree, and the author and his brother would have to defend their dad's choice. However, when they finally saw their dad in action at the tree lot, they realized that he wasn't really looking for the perfect tree, but rather just picking one that looked good enough. The author's dad has always been drawn to the oddball and the underdog, and he likes "rescuing" imperfect trees. The author believes that the imperfections in life are what make it memorable and special, and that striving for perfection can remove the stories and moments that make us laugh. The author thinks that embracing life's imperfections is what makes it uniquely human, and that's what makes the imperfect Christmas tree so special. The story is a reminder that it's the imperfections in life that make it worth remembering, and that perfection is not always the goal. The author's point is further illustrated when he finds out that the tree fell over at his parent's house, and he thinks that's perfect in every sense of the word.
CdXz5zHNQW_oVJjb6nvEG.png
Technology consistently outpaces the legal and regulatory frameworks designed to govern it. Innovations begin as conveniences but can fundamentally alter established norms and rules. Starbucks, for instance, inadvertently became a financial institution by requiring customers to preload funds for app purchases, accumulating billions in customer balances without a banking license. This illustrates how design choices, rather than outright rebellion, can create regulatory blind spots. Uber pioneered a model of launching first, operating in a legal grey area, and then leveraging widespread adoption to legitimize its existence. This "move fast, let the system adapt" approach has become a pervasive strategy in the tech economy. OpenAI's Sora model, capable of generating video from text, raises questions about copyright as it learned from existing human-created works without explicit permission or compensation. Current copyright law, designed for physical copying, struggles to address AI's ability to ingest vast amounts of creative content. The speed of technological iteration, measured in days, far exceeds the deliberation of regulators, who operate on yearly timelines. This gap means laws often describe existing actions rather than defining what is possible. While formal oversight lags, informal mechanisms like reputation and public trust attempt to fill the void, though they are more fragile. Ultimately, progress should not erase the people it relies upon, and while innovation may not seek permission, it should arguably still seek consent.
Tommy Fleetwood won the Tour Championship, concluding the 2025 PGA Tour season with a significant payday. The LIV Golf season also ended, prompting an examination of the performance of players who joined the Saudi-backed tour. Using major championships as a benchmark, LIV golfers have largely underperformed since accepting massive, guaranteed contracts. This contrasts with the PGA Tour's performance-based pay structure.The guaranteed money offered by LIV Golf appears to have negatively impacted the motivation and performance of many players. For example, Dustin Johnson and Cameron Smith, formerly top-ranked, have seen significant drops in their world rankings and major championship performance since joining LIV. This decline is attributed to a lack of accountability and the comfort that comes with guaranteed wealth. Unlike team sports where players are accountable to teammates and coaches, individual golfers only answer to themselves.This dynamic extends beyond golf, offering lessons for financial markets. A prolonged bull market may have made investors and companies too comfortable, similar to the LIV golfers. The author suggests that this complacency, coupled with current market valuations, makes portfolios vulnerable. It is advisable to adopt a team-player mentality, remain vigilant, and rebalance portfolios into less risky assets. Companies with strong cultures and proven leadership through difficult times are also more resilient. The author concludes that feeling most comfortable in the market often signifies the greatest vulnerability.
CdXz5zHNQW_GNR3ZiDJeC.jpeg
The CEO of Bronco Wine humorously suggested that competitors overcharge for water, implying their low wine prices were normal. Franklin Roosevelt playfully anticipated historians' struggles to find definitive answers in his presidential library. Many attempted flight before the Wright Brothers, with Otto Lilienthal dying from a crash, stating sacrifices must be made. Gabby Gingras, unable to feel pain, suffered severe self-inflicted injuries, highlighting pain's essential role in safety. Eleanor Roosevelt reflected on rebelling against uncertainty in later life. Henry Ford's entrepreneurial spirit turned Model T wood scraps into the Kingsford Charcoal company, a market leader. BlackRock CEO Larry Fink observed a disconnect between generational wealth fund objectives and quarterly performance measurement. Robin Williams' simple answer to an economics question suggested profound wisdom beyond formal education. Michael Lewis emphasizes that great ideas often come from patiently waiting rather than forced schedules. JFK's father prioritized public perception over his son's marital happiness, influencing his presidential ambitions. Early opposition to cars in Washington D.C. revealed resistance to technological change. Germany's post-WWI disarmament paradoxically led to a highly modernized military due to rebuilding from scratch. Ulysses S. Grant's absence from Ford's Theatre, influenced by his wife's dislike of Mary Lincoln, might have altered history. Comedians like Chris Rock test material in small venues, illustrating that visible success is often a fraction of the underlying effort. Economic data from different presidential terms showed contrasting performance, yet public satisfaction with the country remained consistently low while personal satisfaction was higher.
The future of user interfaces and experiences is being shaped by the increasing presence of AI in our lives, with a potential shift towards a world without screens. Emmett Shine, co-founder of Gin Lane, envisions a future where humans will exist without screens for hundreds of thousands of years, similar to how they did before their invention. This idea is also being explored by companies like Meta and OpenAI, which are investing heavily in AR/VR headsets, smart glasses, and other technologies that could replace traditional screens. A screenless future would require significant advancements in areas like hardware, voice dictation, and motion detection, and several startups are already working on these technologies. New companies are emerging with innovative solutions, such as AI-powered devices that feel like jewelry or clothing, and voice dictation apps that can hold real-time conversations. The development of human-level motion detection is also crucial, with companies like Ambient.ai working on delivering near-human perception in physical spaces. As technology becomes more immersive and hands-free, design will play a key role in shaping the user experience, with a focus on tone, empathy, and personality. In a screenless future, brand identity and trust will become even more important, as companies will need to create experiences that are respectful, empathetic, and human-centered. The ultimate goal of a screenless future is to create technology that is virtually invisible, allowing people to focus on their lives and interactions, rather than being distracted by screens. By making technology disappear into the background, we can create a more peaceful and human-centered world, where technology serves us rather than demanding our attention.
The AI scene has seen a surge in writing assistants, chatbots, and other tools, but OpenAI's ChatGPT has dominated the market with its steady rollout of new features. This has put a strain on startups trying to compete, leading to the question of how to build consumer applications when OpenAI has such a large share of user attention and data. However, instead of copying or giving up, startups can find spaces where OpenAI can't compete, such as areas where its size works against it. OpenAI's ChatGPT has become a default destination for consumer AI, with hundreds of millions of weekly users and vast compute power, but there are areas where startups can carve out their own ground. Startups can focus on areas such as vertical trust and domain expertise, bridging to the physical world, and closing the creativity gap, where OpenAI's general-purpose chatbots struggle. These areas require specialized expertise, real-world integration, and human curation, which can be difficult for a digital-first company like OpenAI to replicate. By focusing on these areas, startups can create value and differentiate themselves from OpenAI. The key is to find places where AI is a means to something bigger, and where giants like OpenAI stumble, such as deep trust, real-world execution, or genuine novelty. Ultimately, success is not about trying to outscale OpenAI, but about finding places where AI is a means to something bigger, and where value will continue to accrue in the gaps that AI can't fill. By identifying and addressing these gaps, startups can create a competitive edge and build successful consumer applications.
CdXz5zHNQW_3cB7wWwlOx.png
CdXz5zHNQW_KTZkE1g4cy.png
CdXz5zHNQW_D9cHNzHBBv.jpeg
The MIT Media Lab is celebrating its 40th anniversary, a place that was created to make space for new and unconventional ideas. The lab was designed to be interdisciplinary, bringing together people from different fields who didn't fit into traditional departments. Its purpose was to explore how computers could impact everyday life, not just computing, but living. The lab's approach was to develop solutions without knowing the problems, allowing for breakthroughs to happen at the edges of conventional thinking. This approach is similar to other innovative institutions like Bauhaus, Black Mountain College, and Bell Labs, which attracted visionaries and outsiders. Today, we are at a moment that requires a similar response, with the emergence of AI, which is not just a faster way to do things, but a new medium for thought, interaction, and aesthetics. However, instead of treating AI as a new substrate for thought, we are using it to reinforce legacy systems, rather than challenging assumptions. What is needed are new models that combine friction between disciplines, treat computation as a raw material, and allow design to lead, such as the AI Residency in New York. The goal of these efforts is not to create more apps, but to ask better questions and create new literacies, and to understand the impact of AI on human relationships and understanding. The future of technology will be determined by small groups with unusual perspectives and the freedom to follow them, and we should support the pursuit of these groups and build spaces that make them possible.