ProPublica investigated how major law firms are increasingly hesitant to challenge the Trump administration due to fear of retaliation. Law firms are declining cases against the administration, even pro bono, impacting groups challenging its policies. Trump targeted firms for their past actions, issuing executive orders that hurt those involved in legal battles against him. The American Bar Association and advocacy groups are finding it harder to secure legal representation. Some firms have reached settlements to provide pro bono work for Trump-approved causes. Organizations like NPAP and Julian are struggling to find pro bono legal support, hindering their ability to pursue civil rights cases. This trend represents a chilling effect, limiting the ability of nonprofits and individuals to challenge government actions. Even firms that initially fought against Trump's first administration are now shifting their focus or avoiding certain cases. Many firms now avoid anything that Trump might perceive as his enemy, fearing similar repercussions. Ultimately, the chilling effect restricts access to justice and weakens the ability to hold the administration accountable.