VDH: The War Between Trump's Chemotherapy & The Biden Cancer

The author uses chemotherapy as a metaphor for the controversial actions of a potential future administration seeking to reverse the perceived damage inflicted by the previous one. The prior administration's border policies led to a massive influx of illegal immigrants, altering the nation's demographics with no clear end in sight. Appeasement abroad involved weakening sanctions on Iran and a hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan, emboldening adversaries. Domestically, DEI initiatives fostered a new form of institutionalized bias, undermining meritocracy and constitutional principles. The Green New Deal, while seemingly virtuous, drove up energy costs and threatened economic stability. Reversing these policies requires difficult and unpopular measures, such as border enforcement, confronting adversaries, dismantling DEI, and promoting affordable energy. These actions, like chemotherapy, are portrayed as necessary, though painful, to address the metastasizing problems. The media and the left often criticize these corrective measures, focusing on the short-term pain rather than the long-term consequences of inaction. The author questions what the logical endpoint of the previous administration's policies would have been. The author implies that the necessary corrections are essential to prevent societal collapse. He asserts that the long-term consequences of the metastasis will be much more dangerous than the corrective measures.