DEV Community

Why Your Git Branching Strategy Is Breaking Your Database Deployments

Database deployments remain a challenge in DevOps despite advancements in application delivery. A common pitfall is the "branch-per-environment" Git strategy, which leads to merge conflicts, hotfix drift, and QA environments diverging from production. This approach increases risk, especially for stateful systems like databases, hindering visibility and complicating rollbacks. A better approach is Trunk-Based GitOps for databases. This involves using a single main branch as the source of truth for all database changes. Environments are managed declaratively through metadata, not separate branches or folders. Promotions to different environments occur via pipeline stages, eliminating problematic Git merges. This clean model simplifies automation and ensures environment consistency. Tools like Harness Database DevOps support this strategy by enabling Liquibase-native changelogs with context-based targeting. CI/CD pipelines pull from the main branch and apply changes declaratively, with robust rollback capabilities. Git serves as the single source of truth, making database deployments safe, scalable, and reproducible. Consolidating changelogs into a single branch enhances traceability and provides a reliable source of truth. By handling promotions through automated pipelines rather than Git merges, teams can achieve greater confidence in their database change management. Embracing GitOps offers visibility, policy enforcement, and rollback control for smoother database workflows.
favicon
dev.to
dev.to
Create attached notes ...