Twitter users are finding humor in Anthropic's export control difficulties, as the company's prior emphasis on AI danger now seems to be affecting them directly. The US government's directive to suspend access to certain AI models for foreign nationals highlights a growing division, where powerful technology is being restricted based on nationality. This development suggests a global trajectory towards fragmentation, with AI being treated as a weapon rather than a tool for universal progress. The US export control policy, specifically targeting foreign nationals even within its borders, underscores a shift from controlling access by governments to controlling it by individual nationality. This exclusionary approach raises concerns about nationalism overriding genuine safety considerations. European nations are urged to recognize this shift, as their own technological policy is ill-equipped to handle a landscape defined by power rather than regulation. Europe's reliance on US technology platforms and supply chains leaves it vulnerable in AI-related geopolitical discussions. The author criticizes Europe's internal fragmentation and bureaucratic hurdles that stifle innovation and drive ambitious founders to the US. This creates a self-perpetuating cycle of brain drain and ecosystem weakness. The text argues that Europe must foster greater ambition, ownership, and a willingness to build, moving beyond mere regulation. The author cautions against simply emulating the US, acknowledging its strengths but also its societal divisions and tendency towards conflict. The author stresses the importance of international cooperation and open-source principles as a countermeasure to the concentration of AI power in few hands. Ultimately, the piece advocates for cooperation, warning that a fragmented world governed by competing power blocs will erode individual rights and stability.