UX Collective | Medium
Follow
Dealing with feature requests, AI’s dehumanization problem, AI in UX research
This week's design resources emphasize the crucial need for design to be perceived as a valuable contributor rather than a cost center. Designers must learn to demonstrate their impact to executives, especially in uncertain economic times. The article "How do you deal with an executive demanding features?" offers guidance on navigating such requests effectively. Pastel is highlighted as a user-friendly feedback tool for UX teams and designers, simplifying client communication.Several editor's picks delve into critical design topics, including why "good UX" alone is insufficient, the dehumanizing aspects of generative AI, and how AI can enhance choice by reducing noise. The publication also features a piece on the mathematical optimization of dicing an onion, a philosophical discussion on building AI for people rather than as people, and a warning about the "illusion of progress" created by AI coding tools. Additionally, the importance of human agency in design and the distinction between simple and easy interfaces are explored.Other notable content includes reflections on what GPT-5 could learn from Apple's headphone jack decision, designing the future of reading, and making products accessible with screen readers. The newsletter also provides resources on automating and augmenting UX research with AI, prototyping conversational AI, and designing for accessibility. Readers are encouraged to support the newsletter through sponsorships or by forwarding it to friends.