The article likens poorly architected software to the Winchester Mystery House, built for 38 years without a coherent plan. This analogy extends to modern AI-driven app development, where features are added piecemeal without underlying structure. The author proposes six architectural moves to rectify this, emphasizing a return to foundational design principles. The first move is to anchor scaffolding and harnesses first by defining a shared object model before features are developed. This ensures that actions have a defined place and purpose within the system. The second move is to compose from defined patterns and components first, establishing reusable behaviors and a controlled vocabulary for interactions. This approach standardizes how features behave, especially in error states, and dictates how they present information. The third move is to keep a running information architecture, treating it as a living document that evolves with the product. This provides a necessary overview and context for ongoing development. The fourth move is to refactor on a standing cadence, scheduling time for reconciliation and cleanup rather than letting technical debt accumulate. This prevents the "sealing off damaged wings" approach seen in the Winchester House. The fifth move is to bind feature scope to location, ensuring that what a feature can do is contextually relevant to the user's current position within the application. This avoids the "omniscient box" problem where features are too general to be useful. Finally, the article stresses that these architectural principles apply to existing applications as a retrofit rather than requiring a complete rebuild. Implementing these moves helps create more coherent, maintainable, and user-friendly software.