Deconstruction, a philosophical practice by Jacques Derrida, involves dismantling hidden assumptions and hierarchies in how we make sense of the world. It focuses on analyzing binary oppositions in language, like simple versus complex, where one term is favored. In UX, research insights often act as these binary constructs, becoming accepted truths without critical examination. Applying deconstruction to UX means challenging the illusion of objectivity in research findings. For instance, a preference for a "simpler" dashboard might hide an assumption that complexity always increases cognitive load. Deconstruction prompts us to question this, considering if complexity can sometimes reduce effort or if "simplicity" reflects cultural bias. Similarly, the notion of "intuitive" design often stems from familiarity rather than innate understanding, a bias that deconstruction can expose. Personas, while useful, can also embed hierarchies by privileging certain user groups over others. By questioning these ingrained binaries and assumptions, we can uncover new design possibilities. The method involves identifying binaries, interrogating their hierarchies, exposing underlying assumptions, and holding both sides in play to create more inclusive designs. This approach reframes research insights as starting points for interrogation, fostering a more dynamic and human-centered design process.