Evidence Briefing – Monólito vs Microsserviços

The article explores the critical decision of choosing between a monolithic architecture and microservices when starting a software system. It emphasizes that there is no universally superior architecture; the best choice depends on factors like the team, product stage, and the specific problem. A rapid review of 23 studies was conducted to analyze the advantages, disadvantages, and situational suitability of both approaches. The research highlights that monoliths offer simplicity and speed, especially for smaller projects and teams, but can become complex and difficult to scale later. Microservices promise scalability and team autonomy, leading to faster software delivery in some cases, although they introduce complexities in management and coordination. The study reveals that microservices are often associated with better scalability and the ability to utilize diverse programming stacks. The article suggests that while monoliths may be suitable initially, microservices might become preferable as the system grows and the team expands. It acknowledges organizational factors influence the choice. The research underscores the importance of carefully considering the trade-offs before deciding on either architecture. The review employs a rapid review methodology to gather evidence.