India's IT Rules Amendment 2026 mandates swift removal of illegal deepfakes and labeling of AI-generated content on platforms. These rules apply strict timelines for content takedown, particularly for harmful content. Platforms risk losing safe harbor protections if they fail to comply with these regulations. The amendment also requires embedding unique metadata in synthetic content. However, a crucial gap exists in verifying what AI systems *refuse* to generate, not just what they produce. The article explores this regulatory blind spot, focusing on the verification of AI safety measures. It proposes CAP-SRP, a cryptographic framework to prove AI's refusal to generate harmful content. The architecture uses a hash chain, digital signatures, and external anchoring. The article provides a working Python implementation of CAP-SRP, detailing its various layers and implementation steps. Grok's issues highlight the need for verifiable refusal proof. CAP-SRP aims to build tamper-evident audit trails for AI content moderation decisions. CAP-SRP compliance is segmented by three levels, bronze, silver and gold. The system emphasizes proving the positive—every attempt and outcome—and ensuring the record's completeness by using SHA-256 to hash the events and build the chain.
dev.to
dev.to
Create attached notes ...
