A manager shared a frustrating experience on Reddit about a vacant position that remained unfilled for months. The HR department claimed a lack of qualified candidates, but the manager suspected otherwise. To test this, the manager applied to their own job posting using a modified resume and even their own CV. Despite having the exact qualifications, their application was automatically rejected within minutes. The issue stemmed from a strict keyword match requirement for "React.js," as differing terminology like "React" led to disqualification. This situation sparked discussions online, with many echoing the sentiment that the job market suffers from hiring problems rather than talent shortages. Commenters shared similar anecdotes of seemingly qualified applicants being overlooked due to rigid screening processes. The prevalence of Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) in hiring was highlighted, with data showing their widespread use by companies. These systems often struggle with synonyms, leading to qualified candidates being dismissed for minor wording differences. Furthermore, resume formatting and parsing issues contribute to a significant percentage of rejections. While most ATS rank rather than outright reject candidates, low rankings can effectively mean rejection due to human recruiters reviewing higher-ranked applications first. This case illustrates how seemingly minor technicalities in screening can prevent skilled individuals from securing employment.