Brandon Smith analyzes the controversy surrounding new AI data centers in the US. He observes that both political parties are divided on the issue, with differing motivations for their stances. While some support data centers due to partisan opposition, the primary public apprehension stems from a lack of clearly defined tangible benefits. The majority of new data centers are dedicated to training and operating artificial intelligence models, consuming significant amounts of power. These facilities are akin to factories producing intangible AI products, unlike tangible goods with visible jobs. Public skepticism arises because the societal advantages of these AI operations are not readily apparent. The push for AI supremacy is framed as a global race, with visions of an AI-integrated society and a "4th Industrial Revolution." However, critics view this as a potentially vaporous "information economy" detached from real-world value. Local communities often oppose data centers due to concerns over power consumption, increased utility bills, and the visual impact on their surroundings. These areas are targeted for their access to cheaper power and land. While data centers create some temporary construction jobs and a limited number of permanent tech positions, these often require importing labor. The author argues that the benefits, such as tax revenue and expanded user access to AI tools, are not compelling enough to justify the costs. He suggests that the development of AI could be less suspicious and more beneficial if driven by genuine progress rather than the agendas of powerful elites. Ultimately, the author concludes that most Americans oppose new data centers in their communities, and forcing the issue will likely only lead to further public anger.