John Carreyrou's New York Times investigation suggests Adam Back as the strongest circumstantial candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. The report focuses on writing style, ideology, technical background, and pre-Bitcoin posts. Carreyrou, known for exposing Theranos fraud, meticulously analyzed Satoshi's writings, including the white paper and forum posts. The investigation considered the trove of emails released by Martti Malmi, a collaborator of Satoshi. Many prior attempts to identify Satoshi had failed, with over 100 names suggested, all based on circumstantial evidence. These attempts were often met with skepticism from the Bitcoin community, who insisted on proof through coin movement. Carreyrou, undeterred, sought the thrill of solving the mystery of Bitcoin's creator. The investigation aimed to find patterns in Satoshi's texts to reveal the identity. Back's denial followed, with a focus on his early interest in cryptography and electronic cash research. Back's early work on ideas that inspired Nakamoto's work makes him a strong candidate. The case remains open but the report makes a strong claim.
slashdot.org
slashdot.org
