Slashdot

Slashdot is a pioneering technology news website that was founded in 1997. It focuses on delivering news, insights, and commentary on various topics of interest across multiple sections such as News, Technology, Science, Tech Culture, and Off Beat. In addition to news articles and blog postings, the site features a robust community-driven system which enables users to comment on articles, participate in discussions, and submit new stories. A strong feature of Slashdot is the comment rating system, where comments are rated by users - allowing for insightful comments to rise to the top of the conversation while filtering out less useful ones. The site also hosts polls on different topics, giving members an opportunity to express their views as part of a broader community. Slashdot covers technology news, product reviews, interviews from tech pioneers, and new technological advancements. It has played a significant role in breaking key tech stories over the years and introducing new ideas and technologies to the tech community. A notable aspect of Slashdot is its nerdy or "geeky" culture, with many members participating in the site being knowledgeable about technical terms, acronyms, jokes, and references, which are also frequently used within the site itself. In summary, Slashdot is a platform filled with a knowledgeable and passionate community, an extensive forum for discussing the latest in technology and science, and a source where readers can find in-depth coverage of the latest innovations and developments in the tech and science communities.

Thread Of Notes

President Trump announced on Saturday morning the creation of an AI Force and the appointment of an AI Czar. He likened this initiative to the successful Space Force he established during his first term. Trump framed his decision as a response to what he called "Radical Left Dumocrats" attempting to destroy the country through various "hoaxes," now including AI. He stated his intention to protect and cherish the growth of the AI industry, preventing it from being hindered or stifled. However, he also vowed to use existing justice systems to identify and address negative aspects of AI. The announcement was made via a lengthy Truth Social post.The exact nature and structure of the AI Force remain unclear, as the White House did not immediately clarify if it would be military or civilian. The tech industry expressed confusion and a lack of prior consultation regarding Trump's surprise announcement. Representatives indicated that the industry was not widely informed and that feedback was not solicited. Some believe Trump feels pressure to address AI despite previously dismissing concerns about it as a hoax. This initiative follows the departure of a previous AI czar, leading to a perception of ad-hoc policy-making. Industry representatives have differing views on the task force's potential purpose, with some hoping for policies that stimulate development and others advocating for a light-touch regulatory approach. This announcement comes just a day after California's governor issued an executive order to strengthen AI safety through new laws and regulations.
Recent intense waves and flooding along the Southern California coast have raised concerns about nuclear waste stored at the San Onofre power plant. Oceanographer Kim McCoy highlighted the proximity of the waste canisters to a walkway protecting the seawall, which could be eroded by rising sea levels and storm waves. While experts generally agree the near-term risk is low, Southern California Edison has pledged to relocate the waste if modeling indicates a future challenge from erosion. The issue of the long-term fate of this highly radioactive spent fuel remains a significant concern, as it will remain at the coastal site indefinitely. Geologists point out that the site's location in a seismically active region with young rocks is not ideal for storing nuclear waste. They also voice concerns about potential tsunami vulnerability and the corrosive effects of ocean air on the storage canisters. Southern California Edison maintains its system is safe for decades, citing design resilience against tsunamis and earthquakes. The utility is reinforcing a path below the seawall and estimates inundation would not occur before 2050. Plans for a deep geological repository at Yucca Mountain failed, leading to ongoing lawsuits against the federal government by utilities for storage costs. The Trump administration is proposing "campuses" in several states to store waste, offering local jurisdictions funding for nuclear cycle development. This initiative aims to address waste at 80 reactor sites and accommodate waste from new proposed reactors.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei advocated for a slowdown in AI development at a San Francisco conference. He proposed embedding third-party evaluators, coordinating safety standards among democratic nations, and eventually achieving global coordination. Meanwhile, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang urged companies to "run as fast as you can" and argued against new regulations. Huang suggested AI companies should independently ensure product safety before release. Former President Donald Trump echoed Huang’s sentiment, calling AI concerns a "hoax" that would benefit China. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the rapid advancement of AI models and the need for increased rigor in monitoring and security. He stated the public has valid reasons to fear AI's potential loss of control and the concentration of power. Google DeepMind's cofounder supported Amodei's approach, and Microsoft's Satya Nadella endorsed broader third-party testing and safety measures, while also publishing internal AI development guidelines. Investor Michael Burry dismissed these calls as self-serving, arguing large language models are not yet artificial general intelligence. He believes competition benefits current leaders and that warnings serve as hype for IPOs. Former Meta AI chief Yann LeCun and AI ethicist Timnit Gebru also expressed skepticism, suggesting the calls to slow down are disingenuous. However, some, like CNN commentator Van Jones, remain concerned, highlighting a lack of clear direction and the seriousness of warnings from departing AI ethicists.
Police officers are using Flock's powerful surveillance search engine, which accesses over 19,000 cameras, with alarming casualness and a lack of accountability. An analysis by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) reveals numerous instances of officers inputting gibberish, jokes, or other nonsense like "LMAO" or "idiot" as search reasons. Many also provide vague reasons such as "investigation" or leave the field blank, indicating a widespread disregard for proper protocol. These audit logs, which are publicly obtainable, show a pattern of misuse, including searching for undocumented immigrants, individuals who had abortions, and protesters. Government surveillance centers have even advised officers to be "as vague as permissible" in their search justifications. Critics argue that requiring officers to justify such pervasive surveillance with "haha" or other frivolous reasons would never be approved by a city council. The EFF contends that existing laws and courts have not adapted to this new technology, leading to deficient auditing and a culture of abuse. They highlight that warrant-less databases foster a system where mass surveillance is treated as a personal search engine, tracking citizens for minor issues or personal whims. While Flock Safety has updated its system to require selecting from a dropdown list of crimes, this change only makes it easier to obscure improper searches without true accountability. The EFF insists that mass surveillance is incompatible with a free society and urges courts and legislatures to implement strict restrictions, including data deletion deadlines and a warrant requirement. Police should be required to demonstrate probable cause to a judge for tracking a person's movements, rather than bypassing constitutional safeguards with arbitrary searches.