The article argues that a second Trump administration would prioritize loyalty and adherence to the president's agenda, contrasting it with his first term. It highlights the recent removal of Gail Slater, the Justice Department's antitrust chief, as evidence of this new standard. Slater is portrayed as an official who pursued her own priorities, which allegedly clashed with the administration's goals.
Specifically, her opposition to the HPE-Juniper merger is cited as a key point of contention, as the administration viewed it as crucial for countering Chinese tech dominance. The article suggests that Slater's stance would have empowered Chinese entities like Huawei. Furthermore, it criticizes Slater's record on free speech, referencing her endorsement of a report that supported online content moderation and praised social media companies for suppressing certain viewpoints.
The article also faults Slater for approving a business deal that allowed Disney to acquire NFL media assets, citing concerns about market concentration and potential consumer price hikes. It implies that Slater's actions were detrimental to American interests by defending companies like Huawei and Disney. The author concludes that Slater's departure is a necessary step to ensure that officials are committed to the MAGA agenda.
zerohedge.com
zerohedge.com
