The author questions the widely held belief that software increases productivity, particularly in light of advancements in AI. He notes that despite massive increases in computing power, productivity growth has significantly declined since the early 1970s, a phenomenon observed by economists like Robert Solow and Paul Krugman. Krugman points to a "productivity lag" as a potential explanation, but data suggests that the information age has not resulted in sustained productivity booms. While software has provided benefits like increased information density and new capabilities, these are not inherently tied to productivity gains. The author argues that software's true purpose is to increase information density within digital output, rather than directly enhancing productivity. He posits that software, like other dissipative structures, requires continuous energy consumption to exist and that AI will not fundamentally alter this purpose. The author suggests that software has primarily benefited large corporations, increasing their profits and market share compared to the overall economy. He encourages readers to critically examine the impact of technology and use their own minds to form conclusions. The text explores the historical evolution and underlying principles of software's role in society. Ultimately, the piece aims to provoke thought and disagreement on the perceived benefits of technology.